Radiometric dating evidence evolution

Tags: Sex veb video newFamous sex chat websitesMalay seks chatFree onlinewebcamsexlove dating sim for girls 1geo datingHot sex linefriend single search engine dating friends site

To suggest that the amount of radioactive decay we observe has occurred within 6,000 years, or even that the majority occurred due to a worldwide flood, is preposterous. Creationists claim that there are many examples where radiometric dating has supposedly been shown to be unreliable.

“This argument is specious and akin to concluding that all wristwatches do not work because you happen to find one that does not keep accurate time…Some of the “errors” are not errors at all but simply results obtained in the continuing effort to explore and improve the methods and their application.”[v] “Studies…are routinely done to ascertain which materials are suitable for dating and which are not, and to determine the cause of sometimes strange results.” For example, the 1801 lava flow in Hawaii was dated to be much older because of the foreign rocks that were included in the magma that were originally much older.[vi] As another example, a living freshwater mussel was dated around two thousand years old due to the old carbon that is within the ocean.[vii] This is called “the reservoir effect,” which “is well known by scientists, who work hard to understand the limitations of their tools…Contrary to creationist propaganda, limitations of a tool do not invalidate the tool.”[viii] “Reservoir corrections for the world oceans can be found at the Marine Reservoir Correction Database.”[ix] Radiocarbon dates can also be skewed because the dated plants are within 200 meters of volcanic vents and are thus getting old Carbon, but “200 m away from the source, plants yielded an age in agreement with that expected.”[x] So for most wood, “there is no such problem because wood gets its carbon straight from the air, complete with a full dose of C-14.”[xi] Creationists claim that C-14 has been found in coal, oil, and natural gas and so they can’t be millions of years old.

They have their work cut out for them, however, because radiocarbon (C-14) dating is one of the most reliable of all the radiometric dating methods.”[iv] From observations, there are usually many daughter isotopes and evidence (including radiohalos) of those having come from parent isotopes, which are less abundant (which is to be expected).

More radioactive decay has taken place within the rocks than could have occurred in just a few thousand years.

Radiometric Dating methods are absolute methods in determining how old testable items are. Therefore it should come as no surprise that creationists…have been trying desperately to discredit this method for years.

“Some of the methods have internal checks, so that the data themselves provide good evidence of reliability or lack thereof.”[ii] Errors will be clearly recognized when the data is analyzed.We do not want to tear down straw men as well as you do not want to be misrepresented.Also, please keep your comments as brief as possible, and if the majority of the comment does not address the current issue, but becomes a red-herring, it will not be posted as well.Any offensive language will automatically disqualify your comment for publication, even if the arguments contained are good.Please comment on the ideas that are presented and not the presenter.Radiometric dating can even work when elements move in or out of rocks.The Earth has been very stable and a lot is known about the composition of the Earth throughout its history, thus scientists are able to make very accurate descriptions and estimations of how the elements have reacted.If you would like to see if an AOI seminar is right for you, or you would like to help the work of Alpha Omega Institute, please visit our website events page or our donate page. [vii] Christopher Gregory Weber, Answers to Creationist Attacks on Carbon-14 Dating, Spring 1982, Vol 3, Num 2, Pages 23-29, accessed July 17, 2014.[viii] Claim CD011.4, last modified July 8, 2004, The Talk Origins Archive, accessed August 7, 2014. Scientists know through diligent research that there are different methods for open systems, closed systems, and different rock types,[i] and corrections are able to be done to determine an accurate result. Naturalistic/Evolutionary Answer: Radiometric dating has proven, over and over again, that the earth is billions of years old.


Comments Radiometric dating evidence evolution

The Latest from ©