Ken pigott dating

Evidence was received from one witness, whereupon the Crown commenced cross examination of that witness.

Objection was taken on the grounds of self-incrimination.

HOFER, Rudolph - CCA, Wood CJ at CL, Sperling JCitation: R v Hofer [2001] NSWCCA 544Sentence appeal.

Supply methylamphetamine on an ongoing basis; a Form 1 matter (possess cannabis - 62 grams).5y with NPP of 3y.

Both vehicles stopped at traffic lights whereupon appellant & at least one other male approached victim's car then pulled him from the vehicle. Aged 47 at time of offences - troubled upbringing - poor health - lengthy criminal record - priors include offences for violence, property & driving - previous imprisonment in 3 Australian states.

Victim attempted to defend himself with a clublock, which was taken from him. Whether conviction unreasonable having regard to the evidence - whether witnesses 'coached'- whether undue weight given to evidence of witnesses. RAE, Stephen John - CCA, Giles JA, Sully & Levine JJCitation: R v Rae [2001] NSWCCA 545Sentence appeal.

The sentencing judge intended to impose head sentences totalling 28 years and NPPs totalling 15 years, both commencing on .

However, the sentences for each of the offences in Indictment 2 commence on a different and later date from the NPP in respect of such offence.

Applicant & co-accused arrested following a controlled delivery of a consignment of pineapples to premises in Sydney.

The consignment contained amphetamine & heroin capsules which had been shipped from China.s.8A of the Bail Act 1978 applied & the applicant was granted conditional bail, however, it was revoked a little over a month later on the Crown's application for a review of that order made pursuant to s.45 of the Act.

SHOW COMMENTS

Comments Ken pigott dating

The Latest from altay-blog.ru ©